Prestige
← All articles
Compliance

Letting Agent vs Landlord: Who Is Responsible for Property Compliance in London?

19 February 20266 min read
Letting Agent vs Landlord: Who Is Responsible for Property Compliance in London?

The division of compliance responsibility between London letting agents and landlords is frequently misunderstood. This guide clarifies who is liable for gas safety, EICRs, fire safety and more.

The Fundamental Misunderstanding

A common and dangerous assumption among London landlords is that instructing a letting agent to manage their property transfers legal compliance responsibility from the landlord to the agent. This assumption is wrong in most cases, and acting on it has resulted in landlords facing prosecution, fines, and civil liability for compliance failures they believed their agent was responsible for. Understanding precisely which obligations can be transferred, under what conditions, and which remain permanently with the property owner is essential for any London landlord who uses a letting or property management agent.

Gas Safety: Written Transfer Required

The Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998 allow a landlord to transfer their gas safety obligations to a managing agent by a written agreement that the agent explicitly accepts in writing. This is the only area of housing compliance where a formal transfer of legal responsibility is available. However, the transfer must be explicit, documented, and mutually agreed. A standard property management agreement that includes a clause describing the agent as responsible for arranging gas safety inspections does not automatically constitute a legal transfer of regulatory responsibility — courts have found that the agent must affirmatively accept the legal obligation, not merely an administrative task. If your management agreement does not contain a specific clause in which the agent accepts legal responsibility as the person responsible under the Gas Safety Regulations, the liability remains with you as the property owner regardless of your contractual arrangement with the agent.

EICR Obligations: Cannot Be Contracted Away

The Electrical Safety Standards in the Private Rented Sector (England) Regulations 2020 impose the obligation to obtain a valid EICR on the landlord. Unlike the gas safety regime, there is no provision in the Electrical Safety Standards Regulations for the formal transfer of legal responsibility to a managing agent. Even if your management agreement purports to make the agent responsible for EICR compliance, the underlying regulatory duty remains with you as the landlord. An agent who fails to arrange an EICR on your behalf may be contractually liable to you for that failure, but the local housing authority will enforce against the landlord, not the agent, with penalties of up to £30,000. Treating the EICR as exclusively the agent's problem is a compliance risk that landlords in London regularly underestimate.

Fire Safety: A Three-Party Split in Blocks

For London flats in converted or purpose-built blocks, fire safety compliance responsibility is divided between the freeholder, the landlord, and in some cases the managing agent. The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 places fire safety responsibility for the common areas of residential blocks on the responsible person — typically the freeholder or their managing agent for the block. The landlord of an individual flat is responsible for fire safety within the demised premises. Smoke and CO alarms within the flat are a landlord obligation under the Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm Regulations. The interaction between building-wide fire safety under the Fire Safety Order and flat-level obligations under the Housing Act 2004 is one of the most complex compliance areas for London landlords and agents.

Deposit Protection: Always the Landlord

The obligation to protect a tenant deposit in a government-approved tenancy deposit scheme within 30 days falls on the landlord as a matter of statute. This obligation cannot be contracted away to a managing agent. Even where an agent collects and holds the deposit, the legal obligation to ensure it is protected within 30 days and that prescribed information is provided to the tenant remains with the landlord. Where an agent fails to protect a deposit they are holding, the landlord may have a contractual claim against the agent, but the tenant's remedy — a penalty of up to three times the deposit amount — is recoverable from the landlord. Landlords should confirm deposit protection status independently rather than relying on an agent's assurance.

Right to Rent: Criminal Liability Stays with Landlord

The Immigration Act 2014 requires landlords to verify that adult occupants have the right to rent property in England. While a managing agent can carry out Right to Rent checks as the landlord's representative, the criminal liability for failure to conduct checks remains with the landlord. An agent who fails to carry out checks on the landlord's behalf creates criminal exposure for the landlord, not the agent, unless the agent has explicitly accepted criminal liability under a specific contractual provision — an arrangement that legitimate agents are unlikely to agree to. Landlords who delegate Right to Rent checks to agents should require documented evidence of each check within 14 days of the start of every tenancy.

Smoke and CO Alarms: Landlord Obligation, Agent as Facilitator

The obligation to install smoke alarms on every storey and CO alarms in rooms with combustion appliances, and to test them at the start of each tenancy, is a landlord obligation under the Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm (Amendment) Regulations 2022. A managing agent can install and test alarms as part of the management service, but the landlord remains liable for non-compliance. Where an agent carries out a tenancy check-in and fails to test the alarms, acting in their capacity as the landlord's agent, the landlord bears the risk of enforcement action by the local authority.

EPC: Landlord Obligation Without Transfer

The Energy Performance of Buildings (England and Wales) Regulations 2012 require landlords to provide a valid EPC to prospective tenants before marketing a property to let. This is a landlord obligation and cannot be transferred to a managing agent in a way that removes the landlord's liability. An agent who markets a property without a valid EPC creates regulatory exposure for the landlord and may also breach their own professional obligations under ARLA Propertymark membership rules. Landlords should confirm EPC status independently before instructing an agent to market the property.

HMO Licensing: Owner Criminal Liability Even with Agent Managing

A mandatory HMO licence under the Housing Act 2004 is granted to the licence holder — who must be the owner of the property, or a person with legal control of it. Operating a licensable HMO without a licence is a criminal offence. Where a managing agent manages an HMO on behalf of an owner, the criminal liability for operating without a licence rests with the owner, not the agent. An agent may assist with the licence application process, but the licence obligation and criminal exposure cannot be transferred.

Practical Steps for London Landlords

Review your management agreement specifically for each compliance obligation. For gas safety, confirm whether a legal transfer of responsibility has been made in writing and accepted by the agent. For all other obligations, confirm that the agent has a documented process for arranging compliance activities, that you receive evidence of compliance — certificates, reports, test records — within 30 days of each completion, and that your agreement includes an indemnity from the agent for losses caused by their administrative failures. Set independent diary reminders for each compliance anniversary as a backstop check. If your agent cannot produce evidence of a current gas safety certificate or EICR on request, take direct action immediately rather than waiting for the agent to resolve it — the legal risk is yours.